Select Page

Trump’s 50-Year Mortgage Idea Misses the Point—Here’s What Would Actually Fix Housing

Sometimes posts may include affiliate links to products on Amazon or eBay or others, and we’ll make a small commission if you click on those links and buy something thru them.

Why a 50-Year Mortgage Sounds Smart (But Isn’t)

On paper, a 50-year mortgage sounds like relief. Stretch the loan, lower the monthly payment, help more people qualify—right? In practice, it’s a barely noticeable band-aid on a gaping wound.

Take a $300,000 home with 20% down and a 6% rate. On a 30-year term, the monthly payment is about $1,439. Stretch it to 50 years? $1,263. That’s a savings of roughly $175 a month, but you’ll pay two extra decades of interest.

Scenario Down Payment Monthly Payment (P&I) Total Paid Total Interest
30-Year Fixed $60,000 $1,438.92 $518,011.65 $278,011.65
50-Year Fixed $60,000 $1,263.37 $758,022.90 $518,022.90
Monthly Savings (50 vs 30): $175.55
Extra Total Interest: $240,011.25

Mortgages aren’t Klarna. It’s not “Hey I can pay $100/mo for a year, or $50/mo for two years!”

It’s like refinancing your credit card just so you can make the minimum payment forever. Sure, the bill feels lighter (slightly…)—but you’ll never own the thing you’re paying for.

This is the literal James Bond villian who said “You’ll own nothing and be happy about it.” The 50 year mortgage is basically this.

Longer Mortgages Don’t Make Homes Affordable—They Make Them More Expensive

When policymakers make financing easier instead of increasing the number of homes, they’re playing with fire. Lower monthly payments mean more people can qualify. More buyers with the same amount of inventory equals bidding wars, not affordability.

Every time the government has tried a demand-side “fix”—first-time buyer credits, ultra-low interest rates, longer amortization terms—prices have simply risen to absorb the extra buying power. The monthly payment ends up right back where it started, but prices skyrocket and total debt balloons.

The Real Reason Housing Is Broken

It’s not interest rates. It’s not greedy realtors. It’s not (mostly) institutional investors.
It’s the simplest equation in economics: too few homes chasing too many buyers.

For decades, America underbuilt. Local zoning boards walled off entire neighborhoods with “single-family only” restrictions, minimum lot sizes, and parking rules that make small, efficient projects impossible.

You can’t fix a supply problem with clever financing. You fix it by building more homes—period.

“Build Anything” Actually Works

There’s a misconception that we need to “build affordable housing” to solve affordability. But people hear that and picture bleak, low-income apartment blocks. That’s not the fix.

The real answer? Build more of everything.

Even if builders put up $1.2 million homes, those buyers move out of $700k homes, which frees up $450k homes, which lets first-time buyers leave apartments. Economists call this the “filtering effect.” Every new home—at any price—adds supply and reduces pressure somewhere down the chain.

Housing works like musical chairs. If you add chairs, everyone gets a seat.

How to Actually Bring Prices Down

1. Fix zoning.
Local governments need to allow smaller lots, duplexes, and townhomes. When Houston removed restrictive zoning, they built fast—and prices stayed reasonable.

2. Cut red tape.
Developers face 18–36 months of approvals, hearings, and impact fees before breaking ground. Every delay adds cost. Streamlining permits speeds up supply.

3. Rethink fees.
Impact and utility fees can add $30,000–$120,000 to a new home. Defer those costs until the home sells or spread them over time instead of upfront.

4. Reward output, not paperwork.
If a builder completes a project within code and on time, reward them with tax breaks. Don’t hand out subsidies for “planning to build.”

5. Encourage efficient construction.
Prefab and modular homes can be built 40–60% faster and 20% cheaper than traditional builds—and they look nothing like “trailers.” We should be cheering them on.

What About the Big Investors?

It’s true that in some markets, large investors have been scooping up single-family homes. But nationally, big institutional players own less than 3% of single-family rentals. The bigger problem is simply lack of new construction. If we build enough homes, investor buying stops distorting the market.

The Bottom Line

Trump’s 50-year mortgage doesn’t solve affordability—it just makes debt last longer.
If leaders are serious about fixing housing, the focus has to shift from “how can we help people borrow more?” to “how can we help people buy for less?”

That means fewer zoning roadblocks, faster approvals, smarter incentives, and more total homes of all types—not government-built ghettos, not artificial demand boosts. Just supply meeting demand again.

When that happens, rents fall, prices stabilize, and families stop competing against hedge funds, flippers, and each other.

Until then? A 50-year mortgage is just another long-term lease you happen to be on the hook for.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *